Edray H Goins
AGEP PRiME 2013
Background: High-Brow Version
Let \( X \) be a compact, connected Riemann surface. It is well-known that \( X \) is an algebraic variety, that is, \( X \simeq \left \{ P \in \mathbb P^n(\mathbb C) \, \bigl| \, F_1(P) = F_2(P) = \cdots = F_m(P) = 0 \right \} \) in terms of a collection of homogeneous polynomials \( F_i \) over \( \mathbb C \) in \( (n+1) \) variables \( x_j \). Denote \( \mathcal O_X \) as the ring of regular functions on \( X \), that is, "polynomials" \( f, g: X \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \); and denote \( \mathcal K_X \) as its quotient field, that is, rational functions \( f/g: X \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \). For example, if \( X \simeq \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) = \mathbb C \cup \{ \infty \} \), then \( \mathcal O_X \simeq \mathbb C[z] \) consists of polynomials in one variable, while \( \mathcal K_X \simeq \mathbb C(z) \) consists of rational functions in one variable. In particular, any rational map \( \beta: X \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \) induces a map \( \beta^\ast: \mathbb C(z) \to \mathcal K_X \) which sends \( J \mapsto J \circ \beta \). The degree of such a map is the size of the group \( G = \text{Gal} \bigl( \mathcal K_X / \beta^\ast \, \mathbb C(z) \bigr) \).
For each \( P \in X \), let \( \mathcal O_P\) be the localization of \( \mathcal O_X \) at the kernel of the evaluation map \( \mathcal O_X \to \mathbb C \) defined by \( f \mapsto f(P) \). Let \( \mathfrak m_P \) denote the maximal ideal of \( \mathcal O_P \); we view this as the collection of rational maps \( \beta \in \mathcal K_X \) which vanish at \( P \). As shown by Weil and Belyĭ, the Riemann surface \( X \) can be defined in terms of homogeneous polynomials \( F_i \) over an algebraic closure \( \overline{\mathbb Q} \) if and only if there exists a rational function \( \beta: X \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \) such that \( \beta: \left \{ P \in X \, \bigl| \, \beta - \beta(P) \in {\mathfrak m_P}^2 \right \} \to \bigl \{ 0, \, 1, \, \infty \} \). The difference \( \beta - \beta(P) \in \mathfrak m_P \) for any \( P \in X \) because the function vanishes at \( P \); the condition \( \beta - \beta(P) \in {\mathfrak m_P}^2 \) means the derivative of the function vanishes as well. A rational function as above where these critical values are at most \( 0 \), \( 1 \), and \( \infty \) is called a \textit{Belyĭ map}.
Following Grothendieck, we associate a bipartite graph \( \Delta_\beta \) to a Belyĭ map \( \beta: X \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \) by denoting the "black" vertices as \( B = \beta^{-1}(0) \), "white" vertices as \( W = \beta^{-1}(1) \), midpoints of the faces as \( F = \beta^{-1}(\infty) \), and edges as \( E = \beta^{-1}\bigl([0,1] \bigr) \). This is a loopless, connected, bipartite graph, called a \textit{Dessin d'Enfant}, which can be embedded on \( X \) without crossings. The group \( G = \text{Gal} \bigl( \mathcal K_X / \beta^\ast \, \mathbb C(z) \bigr) \) permutes the solutions \( P \) to \( \beta(P) = z \), and hence acts on the dessin \( \Delta_\beta \). The hope is that in studying graphs \( \Delta_\beta \) one can better understand quotients \( G \) of the absolute Galois group \( \text{Gal} \bigl( \overline{\mathbb Q}/\mathbb Q \bigr) \).
In the proposed projects below, we are motivated by the following question: Given a loopless, connected, bipartite graph \( \Gamma \) on a compact, connected Riemann surface \( X \), when is \( \Gamma \simeq \Delta_\beta \) the \textit{Dessin d'Enfant} of a Belyĭ map \( \beta: X \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \)?
Background: Low-Brow Version
Prerequisites
Sample Problems
Given a loopless, connected, planar, bipartite graph \( \Gamma \), use properties of the symmetry group \( G \) to construct a Belyĭ map \( \beta: \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \) such that \( \Gamma \) arises as its Dessin d'Enfant.- Given four distinct complex numbers \( z^{(-1)} \), \( z^{(0)} \), \( z^{(+1)} \), and \( z^{(\infty)} \), prove that we cannot always find a Belyĭ map \( \beta: \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \) such that the associated Dessin d'Enfant \( \Gamma = K_{2,2} \) is the complete bipartite graph having \( B = f^{-1}(0) = \bigl \{ z^{(0)}, \, z^{(\infty)} \bigr \} \) and \( W = f^{-1}(1) = \bigl \{ z^{(-1)}, \, z^{(+1)} \bigr \} \).
- There exist Belyĭ maps \( \phi: \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \) which are invariant under the group \( S_3 = \left \langle r, \, s \, \bigl | \, r^3 = s^2 = (s \, r)^2 = 1 \right \rangle \) as generated by the M\"{o}bius Transformations \[ r(z) = \dfrac {z-1}{z} \qquad \text{and} \qquad s(z) = \dfrac {z}{z-1}. \] How does the Dessin d'Enfant of a given Belyĭ map \( \beta: \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \) compare to the Dessin d'Enfant of the composition \( \phi \circ \beta: \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \)?
- For each subgroup \( H \subseteq S_3 \), find all Belyĭ maps \( \phi_H \) which are invariant under \( H \), that is, \( \phi_H \bigl( \gamma(z) \bigr) = \phi_H(z) \) for all \( \gamma \in H \).
- The families of graphs \( K_{1,n} \), \( K_{2,n} \), \( P_{n+1} \), and \( C_{2n} \) may each be realized as the Dessin d'Enfant of some Belyĭ map. Are there other families of graphs that may be realized as Dessins d'Enfants?
- Is the Dessin d'Enfant of \( \beta(z) = \dfrac{\bigl( z^{2n} + 6 \, z^n - 3 \bigr)^3}{36 \, z^n \, \bigl( z^{2n} + 3 \bigr)^2} \) the prism \( P_2 \times C_{2n} \)? Conversely, can every bipartite prism graph be realized as the dessin of some Belyĭ map? What about the Cartesian product \( P_m \times C_{2n} \)?
- Each of the Platonic Solids may be realized as a Dessin d'Enfant. Which of the truncated Platonic Solids may be realized as a Dessin d'Enfant?
- Given a Dessin d'Enfant \( \Gamma = \bigl( B \cup W, \, E \bigr) \) associated to a Belyĭ map \( \beta: \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \to \mathbb P^1(\mathbb C) \), there are several operations one can perform:
- delete edges from \( E \)
- change colors of the vertices \( V = B \cup W \)
- etc.