Que decir en gral: The authors use numerical solvers to get results on attenuation and duispersio. But they do not give any reference where error analysis has been done as difference betwen differential and numerical silutions in a given norms. also, no indication of the meshes used and if they were refined enough to solve the diffusion processes 1) Ba et al. present a double porosity model considering rock's fabric and fluid heterogeneities, considering single-phase fluids. For the gas and water partial saturation, in the ultrasonic range they observe two inflection points of the velocity and the two attenuation peaks, one caused by fabric heterogeneity, and the by patchy saturation. 2) Hunziker et al. present a numerical study of attenuation an dispersion in porous rocks saturated by single-phase fluids with 2D stochatic fracture networks. Their numerical experiments observe two attenuation peaks both for P and S waves. The two peaks, due to wave-induced fluid flow, are associated with the different density and connectivity fractures. The FE procedure is the one presented by myself in CMAME 2009 (not referred), and by Rubino et al (my former PhD student) in GPY as first author, where a collection of pariori errror estimates are given. 3) Barbosa et al. perform a numerical study of seismic attenuation and dispersion considering a 2D anisotropic fractured backgroud biot medium and single-phase fluids. They perform compresibility and shear tests on representative samples to obtain theomputed the phase velocity and attenuation of P and S waves as functions of frequency and incidence angle. This is in the same spirit of my origianl paper of 2009 in CMAME 2009). 4) Rozkho et al. (2019) investigated the effect of the hysteresis of liquid bridges on seismic attenuation and bulk moduli of a partially saturated rock. Their model use too many parameters to rerpesent the effect of capillary presusre not avalaible in laboratory experiments. The model we use is coming from Scheidegger original works in the 50's, and used in the oil industry for numerical reservoir simulations. 5)Rozkho et al. (2020) Extend Gassmann's theory to include surface tension using Brooks‐Corey correlation. It is not aplicable in our model, since we have funicular regime (Scheidegger) 6) Kewen Li and Roland N. Horne Use fractal geometry to represent capillary pressure for a type of rock which expeirmental data can not be represented by the Brooks-Corey capillary pressure model 7) pride04: Study seismic attenuation due to wave-induced fluid flow. They use a double porosity model of a mixture of two porous solidssaturated by a single-phase fluid. They study heterogeneities in the lithology, the case of patchy saturation, and squirt flow. Thye conclude that squirt flow can not explain the levels of attenuation observed in the seismic band. For patchy saturation, they estimate when the capillary effects are important for fluid equilibration. In situations where both phases form continuous paths across each averaging volume, it is best to determine the attenuation and phase velocity by seeking the plane longtitudinal wave solution of nonreduced ‘‘double-porosity’’ governing equations. However, this approach is not pursued here. !!!!! Thus, they do not consider the funicular regime we use. !!!!!! lovera@ucla.edu Datos del vehículo: Dominio: AD992DK Tipo: Automotor Marca: RENAULT Modelo: SANDERO STEPWAY PH2 PACK 1.6 Año: 2019 Datos del titular del vehículo: Persona: Física Número de documento/CUIT: 07682673 Nombre: JUAN ENRIQUE Apellido: SANTOS E-mail: jesantos48@gmail.com Teléfono: 1130025491 Localidad: Lomas de Zamora Datos del turno: Planta: Local Lomas de Zamora Dirección Lago Aluminé 1805 Día: 10/12/2020 Hora: 12:00 Debe presentar en la planta la siguiente documentación: Si es primer grabado (sea 0km o usado): 1 Cédula verde o azul 2 DNI Lista re revisores Francesco Mainardi, Bologna University, mainardi@bo.infn.it Osvaldo Campanella, campanella.20@osu.edu, Ohio State University Caputo Michele, Rome University La Sapienza, email: mic.caput27@gmail.com Boris Gurevich, Curtin University, email: b.gurevich@curtin.edu.au Francisco Sanchez Sesma, UNAM, sesma@unam.mx Xu Liu, liu.xu@kfupm.edu.sa, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Stewart Greenhalgh, greenhalgh@kfupm.edu.sa, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ursula Iturraran Viveros (ursula.iturraran@gmail.com) UNAM