In the last example, we were able to compute \(\mathscr{L}^{-1}\{\text{a product of Laplace transforms}\}\) because the product was a rational function, we were able to use the partial fractions tool to turn the product into a sum, and then we could use the linearity of \(\mathscr{L}^{-1}\) to finish the computation.
We have not yet encountered Laplace transforms that are not rational functions, so the examples that we are doing today will not really show you the power of this new technique. That being said, they will help to bolster our confidence in the new technique and help us to develop skills that will be required later.
Let \(f(t)\) and \(g(t)\) be piecewise continuous functions for \(t \geq 0\text{.}\) We define the convolution of \(f\) and \(g\text{,}\) denoted \(f * g\text{,}\) for \(t\geq 0\) by
NOTE: Your textbook and the table of Laplace transforms use \(\tau\) instead of \(w\) for the variable of integration in (βΆ). I am choosing to use \(w\) because it is easy to distinguish from \(t\) when writing. Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish between \(t\) and \(\tau\) when writing, and all of us will be writing on the exam.
If \(f\) and \(g\) are piecewise continuous for \(t \geq 0\) and of exponential order with constant \(c\text{,}\) then \(\mathscr{L}\{f(t)*g(t)\}\) exists for \(s \gt c\) and
Example232.Inverse Laplace transforms of products.
In Example 228, we showed that \(\mathscr{L}^{-1}\left\{\frac{1}{s-2}\cdot\frac{1}{s+1}
\right\} = \frac{1}{3}e^{2t}-\frac{1}{3}e^{-t}
\text{.}\) Verify that